Category Archives: Conflict

Chávez to Seize All Seaport Warehouses

VENEZUELA-IRAN-CHAVEZ-AHMADINEJAD

The Associated Press is reporting that Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez will seize all of his nation’s privately-owned seaport warehouses, citing “state security” as the reason. The message came from the country’s Public Works Minister Diosdado Cabello.

Chávez has already expropriated a significant portion of the gold and petroleum industries, a good deal of the food staple distribution system, as well as most steel and iron manufacturing, and has designs on doing the same with the gas industry. Chávez has also managed to suppress the bulk of Venezuela’s dissenting media over the past few years by not renewing their communications licenses.

In 2008, he began to phase out the nation’s currency, the Bolívar, replacing it with “el Bolívar fuerte” (the Strong Bolívar); each of the new marks being worth one thousand of the old. The move induced a short-lived confidence in the Venezuelan market, but the value of the existing currency has fallen by almost 80% versus the US Dollar during the past year and a half . While against the burgeoning Euro, it has done much worse. On the black market (proving, I suppose, that there is no honour among thieves) the ‘back-alley service charge’ on the new currency is higher than for the standard Bolívar. (Note: Most currency exchange systems list only the standard Bolívar by default.)

At this rate, how will Chávez be able to afford his considerable sword addiction? Or, more importantly, how will the average family be able to afford the basic necessities of life?

I wonder where he could be getting such crazy ideas?

Leave a comment

Filed under Chicanery, Conflict, Economy

Russia, China Set to Cast Off US Treasuries for IMF Debt

Here’s a Bloomberg article on the intended swap. 

Want to know why? 

It ties into this story: BRIC to Discuss New World Currency.

But the overall plan is outlined here: On the Current State of Currency.

Leave a comment

Filed under Conflict, Economy

DPRK: Nuke Warning

kim-jong-ilPer our June 2nd posting, North Korea has begun to ratchet up its rhetoric in advance of the anticipated succession of Kim Jong-un to the leadership of the DPRK; the chief rationalisation seeming to be that any leader of the insular communist regime must be tried by fire. 

In its latest round of hostile hyperbole (as reported by the Korean Central News Agency – KCNA) it was declared that the nation’s growing nuclear arsenal would be wielded as a “merciless offensive means to deal a just retaliatory strike to those who touch the country’s dignity and sovereignty even a bit.” 

(Even a bit? C’mon, Mr. Kim. By that standard, you’d certainly have to nuke yourself, personally. And maybe more than once!  — Ed.) 

It was the first time that North Korea’s nuclear arms have been portrayed as “offensive” in nature by its official news agency. 

More details on Jong-un’s rise (including acknowledgement of that apparent fact by his eldest brother) and the DPRK’s most recent threats are available in this linked TimesOnline article.
 

Read about some little-known DPRK nuclear developments 
in the following stories from our recent archives:
 

Sum Yung Sun Rises, in the North

JUNE 2, 2009 Watch for Kim Jong-il to create a ‘defining moment’ to mark his youngest son’s anticipated ascendancy…

 

The Syrian ex-Nuclear Site

MAY 31, 2009  The following is a collection of images taken during (and after) the construction of the Syrian facility bombed by Israeli commandos on September 6, 2007. […]

 

Exactly 55 Years, 10 Months

MAY 27, 2009  Fifty-five years and ten months. That’s precisely how long the Korean Armistice lasted. […]

 

DPRK: N-Test, Take X

MAY 25, 2009  The UN Security Council has unanimously condemned North Korea’s latest nuclear firing test, which everyone seems to be assuming is their second such detonation. That might not be the case…

 

DPRK: N-Test, Take 2

APRIL 27, 2009  It was early October, 2006. Overhead, satellites skimmed the sky above the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and took careful note of the goings-on below.
On the ground, as well as far beneath it, technicians busily prepared for North Korea’s highly-anticipated, first nuclear weapons test – an event that was confirmed in dramatic fashion on October 9th, when it appeared on one of the seismographs I was monitoring…

 

6 Comments

Filed under Chicanery, Conflict

Is one Jewish state one too many?

By HASKELL NUSSBAUM
Originally appeared in the Jerusalem Post Jun 6, 2009
 

YorkThis month a consortium of Canadian universities and institutions will be sponsoring a conference at York University in Toronto that will effectively conclude that one Jewish state in the world is one too many.

The conference, innocuously named “Israel/Palestine: Mapping Models of Statehood and Paths to Peace,” will ostensibly debate whether a “one-state” or “two-state” solution is the best way to advance peace. But the conference’s symbol is a map of Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, with a zipper sewing up the seam lines between them. And a close look at the speakers and the abstracts of their intended speeches show that the overwhelming consensus will be that Israel should cease being a Jewish state and morph instead into a binational one.

It is a rich irony indeed that the conference is ostensibly proposing that Israel annex the West Bank and the Gaza Strip – a position that once might have been considered solely in the domain of the most right-wing Israelis. But as the program speeches make clear, the proposed solution is not to simply allow Israel to annex territory. Rather, it is to strip the Jewish state of its Law of Return (allowing Jews to immigrate) and uproot the country from its Jewish foundations.

York University’s program makes only a nominal attempt to stir genuine debate. The program is riddled with speakers who take as a given that Israel is an apartheid state that discriminates against Palestinians and that is fundamentally “unjust.” A number of the speakers are recognizable as organizers and advocates of the movement to boycott Israel. Indeed, the handful of notable professors who do not believe that Israel should cease to exist as a Jewish state stand out like vegetarians at a slaughterhouse.

Belatedly realizing the nature of the conference, some have begun to pull out.

Conference defenders have been quick to point to the right of free speech and the value of academic debate to support the program. And it is clear that when discussing Israel and the Palestinians passions are likely to run high. But the issue is not freedom of expression or the value of hearing alternate viewpoints. The issue is not York University’s right to hold such a conference, but rather its desire to do so.

A CONFERENCE is not held in a vacuum. Against a backdrop of the ascendency of Iran calling to destroy Israel, Hamas consolidating its hold over the Gaza Strip and continuing to rain rockets against southern Israeli cities and a global increase in anti-Semitism, is it possible that York University doesn’t understand that a conference calling on Israel to cease being a Jewish Zionist state plays into the hands of those seeking to annihilate it completely?

Never mind that the proposed “one-state” solution is completely unrealistic. Never mind that there is not a single mainstream Israeli political party that would ever endorse it – and that it will therefore simply never materialize. Never mind that a conference held at the end of June, with few students on campus, is mostly an exercise of academics preaching to the converted. The pernicious nature of this conference is not measured by its efficacy at promoting its solution. It’s measured by the legitimacy it confers on those who will build upon it to promote genocide.

This conference, if unopposed, will be copied. The notion that for the sake of peace and justice Israel must be denuded of its Jewish character will be lent the imprimatur of a respected university. In time, nongovernmental organizations, quasi-governmental bodies and international institutions may well quote the conclusions of such conferences, and the movement to boycott Israel will be immeasurably strengthened. Groups like Hamas and Hizbullah will seize on its conclusions immediately, using them to excuse their terrorist activities against the Jewish state.

One need not cut off debate, or the presentation of alternative viewpoints. But is it really too much to expect respected universities not to endorse the destruction of Israel as the world’s only Jewish state?
 

The writer is author of 101+ Ways to Help Israel: A Guide to Doing Small Things That Can Make Big Differences.
  

Leave a comment

Filed under Conflict, Life, Reason

Coalition of the Blade

Leveraging the vast resource base of this generally under-developed continent, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez has been working hard to create a socialist ‘Bolivarian’ revolution in South and Central America. A constant thorn in the backside of the ‘imperialist’ United States, Hugo has lately been ostentatiously doling out copies of the sword once wielded by the El Libertador (Simón Bolívar) to his leftist compatriots. 


chavez swords


Read about the original sword in this New York Times article from 1990. 

The sword was returned to the Bolivar Museum on February 1, 1991 by the M-19 rebels who purloined the prized artifact seventeen years earlier. 

So, is the sword in the Chavez-Correa image actually the real one?

UPDATE: Yes. After close inspection of the images, it appears that the sword shown in both the Raul Castro and Rafael Correa images is the genuine article. Apparently, after Castro and Chavez left grubby fingerprints on the beloved weapon, a decision was taken to don gloves a week later when Correa was invited to also inspect the original — before leaving with his own copy.

.

2 Comments

Filed under Chicanery, Conflict, Humour, Images